Tim Harper

It’s a little odd when a serious newspaper attempts to mount a campaign against technology, but Geoffery Lean, environmental editor […]

Philosophers? “Please get our name right… it’s Center for Responsible Nanotechnology, not Centre. I know that’s the British spelling, but

Motley Fool returns to the subject of nanotech with the conclusion that “Yes, this nano stuff is for real” but

Floyd the Chimp catches the zeitgeist. We would have laughed if we hadn’t seen similar simplistic reasoning popping up like

A story that made us laugh so hard we nearly reconstituted our rations appears in New Scientist this week. In

Hon Hai, one of the worlds largest and quietest electronics manufacturers, will invest NT$12 billion (US$354.3MM) to build a nanotechnology

The Centre for (ir)Responsible Nanotechnology catches more than a few brickbats from us, chiefly for their espousal of 30 essential

Howard Lovy investigates making a buck and raises an interesting question, “What kind of nanotechnology information would you pay for

“Now, who wants to cover nanotech this week?” As the northern hemisphere warms up, news editors begin scraping the barrel

Now available to mark the 50th anniversary of the patent on the geodesic dome – the inspiration for Buckyballs.