Tim Harper

Motley Fool returns to the subject of nanotech with the conclusion that “Yes, this nano stuff is for real” but […]

Philosophers? “Please get our name right… it’s Center for Responsible Nanotechnology, not Centre. I know that’s the British spelling, but

It’s a little odd when a serious newspaper attempts to mount a campaign against technology, but Geoffery Lean, environmental editor

Hon Hai, one of the worlds largest and quietest electronics manufacturers, will invest NT$12 billion (US$354.3MM) to build a nanotechnology

A story that made us laugh so hard we nearly reconstituted our rations appears in New Scientist this week. In

Howard Lovy investigates making a buck and raises an interesting question, “What kind of nanotechnology information would you pay for

The Centre for (ir)Responsible Nanotechnology catches more than a few brickbats from us, chiefly for their espousal of 30 essential

“Now, who wants to cover nanotech this week?” As the northern hemisphere warms up, news editors begin scraping the barrel

Ireland now has its own definition of nanotechnology, so does that mean that there is something wrong with the existing

Two clear trends are emerging from the swirling mists of nanotech (or three if you believe the increasing rumours of