As the aviation industry seeks pathways to decarbonization, the intricate economic relationship between green hydrogen and Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) has emerged as a critical factor in determining the future viability of low-carbon flight. This comprehensive analysis explores how hydrogen pricing influences SAF production costs, examines the policy frameworks designed to support this transition, and projects the economic trajectory of hydrogen-based aviation fuels through 2040. The economics reveal both significant challenges and promising opportunities as governments worldwide implement mandates to accelerate adoption of these revolutionary fuels.
The Fundamental Role of Hydrogen in SAF Production
Green hydrogen serves as a cornerstone input for several key SAF production pathways, particularly in Power-to-Liquid (PtL) processes where it combines with captured carbon dioxide to create synthetic jet fuel. This production method represents one of the most promising routes to truly sustainable aviation fuel with minimal lifecycle emissions when powered by renewable electricity and utilizing direct air capture technology for CO2 sourcing.
Hydrogen plays a dual role in aviation decarbonization efforts, functioning both as a critical component in SAF production and as a potential direct fuel source for short-haul flights. This versatility positions hydrogen as an essential element in the broader sustainable aviation ecosystem. The hydrogen utilized in SAF production significantly influences the overall carbon footprint of the resulting fuel, with green hydrogen dramatically reducing lifecycle emissions compared to hydrogen derived from fossil sources[1].
The PtL pathway is particularly energy-intensive, requiring approximately 100 kWh per gallon of SAF produced. This high energy requirement makes the economics of production heavily dependent on hydrogen costs, which currently range from $5-7 per kilogram. At these price points, the production of PtL SAF remains economically challenging without substantial policy support[1]. The 45V hydrogen tax credit in the United States, for instance, plays a crucial role in offsetting these high hydrogen costs to make production more economically viable.
Economic Relationship Between Hydrogen Pricing and SAF Costs
The fundamental economic relationship between hydrogen and SAF reveals an important efficiency consideration: green hydrogen will inherently cost less than net-zero SAF because it requires approximately 3-4 times less energy to produce[6]. This efficiency differential creates an interesting economic dynamic where hydrogen serves as both an input to SAF production and a potential competitor as a direct aviation fuel.
Current projects are actively working to improve this economic equation. The H2-SAF initiative aims to reduce the cost structure of SAF by 3-4% compared to conventional e-kerosene by reducing green hydrogen production costs by 15-20%. This would be achieved through innovative approaches to electrode development, membrane characterization, and lifetime extension through material degradation analysis[2]. The project expects to reach Technology Readiness Level 7 (TRL7) by Q3 2026, with low-cost green hydrogen for SAF production potentially entering the market by 2027.
The economics of Hydroprocessed Esters and Fatty Acids (HEFA), currently the only commercially proven SAF production pathway, further illustrates the challenge. HEFA facilities producing SAF are 86% less efficient than those producing renewable diesel, highlighting the need for targeted policy interventions and incentives to drive scalability and economic viability[1]. This efficiency gap underscores why policy-driven incentives and long-term agreements remain essential for sustainable SAF production.
UK and EU SAF Mandates: Creating Economic Frameworks
Government mandates play a crucial role in establishing the economic foundations for green hydrogen-based SAF production. The UK has implemented one of the most comprehensive frameworks, with a SAF mandate commencing in 2025 that requires SAF to constitute at least 2% of total UK jet fuel demand. This mandate increases linearly to 10% by 2030 and further to 22% by 2040[7].
A particularly significant aspect of the UK mandate is the separate obligation for Power-to-Liquid fuels starting in 2028, which directly impacts hydrogen-based SAF production. This sub-mandate begins at 0.2% and rises to 3.5% by 2040, creating a guaranteed market for hydrogen-based aviation fuels[7]. To provide flexibility, the UK has established buy-out mechanisms at £4.70 ($5.90) per liter for SAF and £5.00 ($6.30) per liter for PtL fuels, effectively establishing price ceilings that inform investment decisions in production capacity.
The UK government is also considering introducing an industry-funded revenue certainty mechanism by 2026 to provide investor confidence in commercial-scale SAF production. This would further strengthen the economic case for green hydrogen-based SAF by providing more predictable returns on investment[7].
The EU’s ReFuelEU Aviation initiative similarly creates important economic frameworks for hydrogen-based SAF. By including green hydrogen and renewable electricity under the synthetic aviation fuel definition, the policy increases available pathways for compliance with the mandate[4]. Some stakeholders have advocated increasing the synthetic fuel sub-mandate to reflect the potential contribution of hydrogen and electricity to aviation energy demand, which could rise to 20-27% by 2050 according to various projections[4].
Economic Projections and Cost Reduction Pathways
The SAF market in the European Union between 2027 and 2040 is estimated to reach approximately 87 million tonnes, corresponding to a requirement for 271 GW of electrolyzer capacity by 2040. This represents a potential total market of €26 billion for electrolyzer technology specifically for SAF production, with approximately €3.1 billion for electrodes alone[2]. These projections indicate the substantial economic opportunity associated with hydrogen-based SAF production.
One of the most promising aspects of green hydrogen-based SAF is its cost reduction trajectory. OXCCU, a leader in carbon-to-value innovation, has developed a CO₂ Fischer-Tropsch (CO₂ F-T) technology that potentially offers 50% lower capital costs than conventional SAF production methods and a 25% reduction in fuel costs per tonne compared to traditional production methods[8]. Such technological innovations could significantly improve the economics of hydrogen-based SAF production.
In the long term, hydrogen fuel costs for aviation could potentially undercut SAF blends, with projections suggesting costs of €0.030 per revenue passenger kilometer (RPK) for hydrogen compared to €0.031-0.035/RPK for SAF blends by 2050[6]. This economic crossover point would represent a significant milestone in aviation decarbonization efforts.
Challenges to Economic Viability
Despite promising projections, several significant challenges remain for the economic viability of green hydrogen-based SAF production. Competition for hydrogen from other sectors presents a major concern, as industries from steel production to ground transportation also seek to utilize green hydrogen for decarbonization[3]. This cross-sector competition could impact both hydrogen availability and pricing for aviation applications.
The need for policy coordination represents another economic challenge. Ensuring that hydrogen subsidies and SAF support mechanisms work together effectively requires careful policy design. The potential exclusion of already subsidized hydrogen from additional support through mechanisms like the SAF Revenue Certainty Mechanism could create economic inefficiencies or barriers to adoption[3].
The capital intensity of scaling hydrogen production also presents challenges. To achieve the UK’s target of 10GW of low carbon hydrogen production capacity by 2030, production capacity would need to grow by over 90% year-on-year on average. This rapid scaling presents both economic opportunities and challenges for investors and technology providers[3].
Conclusion: Economic Viability Trajectory for Hydrogen-Based SAF
The economics of green hydrogen-based SAF production present a complex but increasingly promising picture. While current production costs remain high, the combination of government mandates, technological innovation, and scaling effects creates a pathway to economic viability over the coming decades.
The UK and EU mandates establish critical demand certainty, while technological innovations continue to drive down production costs. The dual role of hydrogen as both an input to SAF production and a potential direct aviation fuel creates interesting economic dynamics that will evolve as technology matures and production scales.
The successful development of an economically viable green hydrogen-based SAF industry will require continued policy support, technological innovation, and substantial investment in production capacity. However, the potential rewards are significant – not only in terms of aviation decarbonization but also in creating new economic opportunities across the hydrogen and sustainable fuel value chains.
As governments worldwide implement and refine SAF mandates through 2030 and beyond, the economics of green hydrogen will play an increasingly central role in determining the pace and scale of aviation’s sustainable transformation. Understanding this critical relationship between hydrogen economics and SAF production will be essential for policymakers, investors, and aviation industry leaders navigating the complex journey to net-zero aviation.
Sources
[1] Role of Hydrogen in DOE’s Sustainable Aviation Fuel Liftoff Report https://fchea.org/role-of-hydrogen-in-does-sustainable-aviation-fuel-liftoff-report/
[2] H2-SAF – MissionGreenFuels https://missiongreenfuels.dk/h2-saf/
[3] Policy nuggets: The UK SAF Mandate – SkyNRG https://skynrg.com/policy-nuggets-the-uk-saf-mandate/
[4] [PDF] Considerations for the ReFuelEU aviation trilogue https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/refueleu-definitions-trilogue-sep22.pdf
[5] [PDF] Sustainable Aviation Fuel in SA: – RSB https://rsb.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/RSB-SAF-Report_WEB.pdf
[6] Green hydrogen will always cost less than a net-zero SAF because it … https://www.reddit.com/r/ClimateOffensive/comments/zhcs16/green_hydrogen_will_always_cost_less_than_a/
[7] UK government outlines mandate plan for an ambitious 10% use of … https://www.greenairnews.com/?p=5627
[8] OXCCU’s New Techno-Economic Report Shows Path to Cost … https://www.oxccu.com/press-releases/oxccus-new-techno-economic-report-shows-path-to-cost-effective-scalable-sustainable-aviation-fuel-saf
[9] Emerging technologies, policies and challenges toward … https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381872562_Emerging_technologies_policies_and_challenges_toward_implementing_sustainable_aviation_fuel_SAF
[10] [PDF] The cost of hydrogen aviation – Final Briefing – DigitalOcean https://te-cdn.ams3.cdn.digitaloceanspaces.com/files/The-cost-of-hydrogen-aviation-Final-Briefing-2.pdf
[11] How Will the UK’s SAF Mandate Affect the Aviation Industry? https://www.resourcewise.com/environmental-blog/how-will-the-uks-saf-mandate-affect-the-aviation-industry
[12] The Introduction of Sustainable Aviation Fuels—A Discussion of … https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4310/10/3/218
[13] [PDF] Green Hydrogen for Aviation – ICAO https://www.icao.int/environmental-protection/Documents/ACT-SAF/ACT%20SAF%20Series%209%20-%20Green%20Hydrogen%20for%20Aviation.pdf
[14] Sustainable Aviation Fuel – the size of the challenge and opportunity https://www.ghd.com/en/insights/sustainable-aviation-fuel—the-size-of-the-challenge-and-opportunity
[15] Bridging the Hydrogen and eSAF policy gap in the UK and EU https://www.greenairnews.com/?p=6688
[16] Sustainable hydrogen energy in aviation – A narrative review https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369548284_Sustainable_hydrogen_energy_in_aviation_-_A_narrative_review
[17] How all sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) feedstocks and production … https://www.bp.com/en/global/air-bp/news-and-views/views/how_all_sustainable_aviation_fuel_SAF_feedstocks_and_production_technologies_can_play_a_role_in_decarbonising_aviation.html
[18] IEA: Expensive green hydrogen-based e-fuels might not lead to … https://www.hydrogeninsight.com/transport/iea-expensive-green-hydrogen-based-e-fuels-might-not-lead-to-skyrocketing-plane-ticket-prices-in-the-short-term/2-1-1577969
[19] [PDF] Developing the UK sustainable aviation fuel mandate – GOV.UK https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66cf1f76a7256f1cd83a89c0/pathway-to-net-zero-aviation-developing-the-uk-sustainable-aviation-fuel-mandate.pdf
[20] How to make climate-neutral aviation fly | Nature Communications https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-39749-y
